Skip to main content

Table 3 Univariate and weighted multiple regression of GDM prevalence

From: Prevalence of gestational diabetes in the United States and Canada: a systematic review and meta-analysis

 

Univariate

Weighted regression

β

95% CI

β

95% CI

Q[B] [df]

Diagnostic criteria used#

1 Carpenter-Coustan

0.87*

0.47 to − 1.27

0.89

0.45 to 1.33

 

2 NDDG

-

-

-

-

24.36 [3]*

3 O’Sullivan & Mahan

0.79*

0.15–1.44

0.88

0.38 to 1.38

 

4 Canada (1998)

0.39

-0.05 to 0.83

0.25

-1.23 to 0.56

 

Start of data collection period

1980–1990

-

-

-

-

18.87 [3]*

1991–2001

-0.24

-0.66 to 0.18

-0.30

-0.73 to 0.12

 

2002–2012

0.49*

0.05 to 0.93

0.33

-0.11-0.78

 

2013–2023

0.55

-0.08-1.17

-0.13

-0.79 to 0.53

 

Routine dataset

No

-

-

-

-

-

Yes

-0.44*

-0.79 to − 0.086

-0.08

-0.40 to 0.23

-

Whether women could be included more than once

Yes

-

-

-

-

-

No

0.42*

0.04 to 0.80

-0.33

-069. to 0.04

-

  1. # Any two values at or above the following plasma glucose thresholds following 100 g OGTT:
  2. 1.Fasting 5.3 mmol/L, 1 h 10.0 mmol/L, 2 h 8.6 mmol/L, 3 h 7.8 mmol/L
  3. 2.Fasting 5.8 mmol/L, 1 h 10.6 mmol/L, 2 h 9.2 mmol/L, 3 h 8.1 mmol/L
  4. 3.Fasting 5.0 mmol/L, 1 h 9.2 mmol/L, 2 h 8.0 mmol/L, 3 h 7.0 mmol/L
  5. Any two values at or above the following plasma glucose thresholds following 75 g OGTT:
  6. 4.Fasting 5.3 mmol/L, 1 h 10.6 mmol/L, 2 h 8.9 mmol/L
  7. 5.Fasting 5.1 mmol/L, 1 h 10.0 mmol/L, 2 h 8.5 mmol/L
  8. *P < 0.05