Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis

From: Prevalence of gestational diabetes in the United States and Canada: a systematic review and meta-analysis

First author, location, years data collected (if routine dataset)

Sampling Method (if denominator could include women more than once) µ

Sample Size (denominator)

Population characteristics

Mean Age (SD)

Mean BMI (SD)

Parity: % nulli-parous

Family History

Screening Type

Gestation at testing (wks)

Diag. criteria used (Category)

Number of cases of GDM

Overall prevalence (95% CI)

Acosta et al., 2001 [43]

Puerto Rico, USA

1997–1998

Retrospective medical note review of all pregnant women in one hospital

3,4471

Residents of Puerto Rico

NR

NR

NR

NR

One step: 50 g OGTT

24–28

ACOG (NDDG)

2

123

3.6% (3.0-4.2)

Aljohani et al., 2008 [44]

Manitoba, Canada

1993–2004 (Routine)

Retrospective study of all pregnant women in one areaµ

1993–1998: 96,7081

1999–2004:

98,5681

13% First Nation

NR

NR

NR

NR

Two step: 50 g GTT then 100 g OGTT

24

CDA 1992

2

CDA 1998

4

FN

734/12,192

6.0% (5.6–6.5)

Non FN

1,874/84,516

2.2% (2.1–2.3)

FN

958/12,221

7.8% (7.4–8.3)

Non FN

3,117/86,347

2.9% (2.8-3.0)

Alunni et al., 2015 [45]

California, USA

2010–2012

Retrospective study of women with singleton pregnancies in one hospital

1,3542

Registered with UC San Diego health provider

NR

NR

NR

NR

Two step: 50 g GCT then 100 g OGTT

24–28

ACOG (CC)

1

70

5.2% (4.1–6.5)

Berkowitz et al., 1992 [46]

New York, USA, 1987–1989

Prospective study of women with singleton pregnancies at one medical centre (if > 1 pregnancy, randomly identified 1)

10,1872

Multi-ethnic population (public only) - geographically defined

NR

NR

NR

NR

Two step: 50 g GCT then 100 g OGTT

26–32

NDDG

2

328

3.2% (2.9–3.6)

Black et al., 2013 [47]

California, USA, 2005–2010

Retrospective study of women with singleton pregnancies at one HMO-affiliated medical centre (first pregnancy during study period)

10,4191

Registered with KP HMO (75% Hispanic)

28.9

31.7% overweight

27.8% obese

NR

NR

One step: 75 g 2 h OGTT

24–28

IADPSG

5

2,516

24.1% (23.2–24.9)

Bodmer-Roy et al., 2012 [48]

Montreal, Canada

2008–2010

Retrospective study of all pregnant women at one medical centre

5,6012

70% Caucasian

NR

NR

NR

NR

Two step: 50 g GCT then 2 h 75 g OGTT

24–28

CDA 2008

4

467

8.3% (8.2–8.4)

Dabelea et al., 2005 [49]

Colorado, USA, 1994–2002 (Routine)

Retrospective study of women with singleton pregnancies in one areaµ

36,4032

Pregnancies (30,216 women)

Registered with KP HMO, 72% non Hispanic white

28 (NR)

NR

NR

NR

Two step: 50 g GCT then 3 h 100 g OGTT

24–28

NDDG

2

1,183

3.9% (3.7–4.1)

Donovan et al., 2016 [50]

Alberta, Canada, 2008–2012 (Routine)

Retrospective study of all primiparous pregnant women in one area

78,5522

Large geographically defined area

NR

NR

100%

NR

Two step: 50 g GCT then 75 or 100 g OGTT

24–28

CDA 2008

4

2,675

3.4% (3.3–3.5)

Dooley et al., 1991 [51]

Chicago, USA

3 year period prior to 1991

Retrospective study of pregnant women at one hospital

3,7442

39% white, 38% black, 20% Hispanic

NR

NR

NR

NR

Two step: 50 g GCT then 3 h 100 g OGTT

24–28

NDDG

2

130

3.5% (2.9–4.1)

Feldman et al., 2016 [52]

California, USA, 2010–2013

Retrospective study among women with one singleton pregnancy during study period at one HMO–affiliated medical centre

Period 1: 2,9722

Period 2: 3,0942

Registered with KP HMO

30.3

30.3

26.1

26.2

31%

40%

NR

Two-step:

50 g GTT followed by 100 g OGTT

One step: 2 h 75 g OGTT

24–28

CC

1

IADPSG

5

512

17.3% (16.0–18.7)

847

27.4% (25.8–29.0)

Ghaffari et al., 2020 [53], San Francisco, USA, 2012–2018

Retrospective study among women with one singleton pregnancy at one university obstetrics department.

Period 1: 6,9622

Period 2: 4,2872

47.1% White, 6.7% Black, 11.7% Latina, 22.6% Asian

40.6% White, 5.7% Black, 13.4% Latina, 19.8% Asian

32.4 (5.5)

32.9 (5.2)

24.2 (5.3)

25.2 (5.4)

61.1%

71.1%

NR

Two-step: GCT then 3 h 100 g OGTT

One-step: 75 g 2 h OGTT

24–28

24–28

CC

1

IADPSG

5

642

9.2% (8.5–9.9)

999

23.3% (22-24.6)

Harris et al., 1997 [54]

Ontario, Canada

1990–1993

Retrospective study of women with singleton pregnancies (random selection if more than one pregnancy during study period)

1,2632

First Nations

NR

25.7 (5.2)

NR

47%

Two step: 50 g OGTT then 100 g OGTT

24–28

3rd International workshop

3

110

8.7% (7.3–10.4)

Hedderson et al., 2010 [55]

California, USA 1995–2004 (Routine)

Retrospective study of women with singleton pregnancies in one area (first pregnancy during study period only)

216,0892

Registered with KP HMO, (excluding Native American, non-specific Asian and unknown ethnicity)

28.4

NR

54%

NR

Two step: 50 g GCT then 3 h 100 g OGTT

NR (assumed 24–28)

CC

1

12,663

5.9% (5.8-6.0)

Hillier, 2021 [56], Hawaii, Oregon, Southwest Washington, USA, 2014–2017

Randomised controlled trial of women with singleton pregnancies receiving care at KP Hawaii and Northwestµ

One step: 11,1272

Two step: 11,1622

55.5% White

15% Asian

5.2% Hawaiian/Pacific Islander

Black

0.4% American Indian

11% Multiple races

0.3% Other

9.8% Unknown

55.5% White

15% Asian

5.2% Hawaiian/Pacific Islander

2.8% Black

0.4% American Indian

11% Multiple races

0.4% Other

9.7% Unknown

29.4 (5.5)

29.3 (5.5)

27.4 (6.7)

27.6 (7.0)

30.5%

30.5%

NR

One step: 75 g 2 h OGTT

Two step: 1 h 50 g GCT then 3 h 100 g OGTT.

24–28

IADPSG

5

CC

1

1837

16.5% (15.8–17.2)

945

8.5% (8.0–9.0)

Hsu et al., 2023 [57] USA, 1998–2016

Retrospective study of all women attending a medical center and affiliated community health centreµ

51,0592

59.7% White

11.6% Multiracial/none of the above 12.4% Hispanic/Latina

8.7% Asian

6.5% Black

30.9 (5.9)

25.5 (5.3)

NR

NR

Two step: 50 g GCT then 3 h 100 g OGTT

28

NDDG

2

2.6%

1303 (2.4–2.7)

Kalamegham et al., 2010 [58]

Texas, USA 2000–2007

Retrospective study of all women attending medical centre and associated clinics

17,6073

84% Hispanic

NR

NR

NR

NR

Two-step: 50 g GCT then 3 h 100 g OGTT

24–28

CC

1

1,397

7.9% (7.5–8.3)

Keiffer et al., 2006 [59]

USA, Detroit

1999–2001

Prospective study of women with singleton pregnancies in one health centre in Detroit

1,0012

Mainly uninsured low-income Latino women

25 (5.1)

25.9

41.2%

18.6%

Two step: 50 g GTT followed by 100 g GTT (among women with RBG > 12.6)

26

CC

1

68

6.8% (5.4–8.5)

Murphy et al., 1993 [60]

Alaska, USA

1987–1988

Retrospective study of singleton pregnant women with Alaska Native Health Service

5432

First Nations women

25.6

NR

NR

NR

Two step: 50 g GCT followed by 100 g OGTT

24–28

2nd International workshop

3

35

6.4% (4.7–8.8)

Oster et al., 2014 [61]

Alberta, Canada 2000–2009 (Routine)

Retrospective study of all deliveries in one areaµ

427, 0581

Large, geographically defined area

FN: 24.9

NFN: 28.8

NR

NR

NR

Two step:

50 g OGC followed by 75 g OGTT

24–28

CDA 2008

4

16,370

3.8% (3.8–3.9)

FN

1,217/28,306

4.3% (4.3–4.4)

NFN

15,153/398,752

3.8% (3.8–3.9)

Palatnik et al., 2017 [62]

Chicago, USA

Period 1: 2010–2013

Period 2: 2013–2015

Retrospective study of singleton pregnancy in one Hospital (first pregnancy during study period only)

Period 1

14 0742

Period 2

9 4352

 

31.6 (5.2)

31.7 (5.1)

30.1 (5.5)

30.2 (5.3)

52.8%

52.8%

NR

NR

One step: 75 g OGT

Two step: 50 g oral glucose then 100 g OGTT

NR

NR

IADPSG

5

CC

1

1,167

8.3% (7.9–8.7)

715

7.5% (7.0–8.0)

Pedula et al., 2009 [63]

Hawaii, USA 1995–2003 (Routine)

Retrospective study of deliveries among women with singleton pregnancies in one areaµ

20,8932

Registered with KP HMO

NR

NR

NR

NR

Two step: 50 g GCT 100 g OGTT

24–28

NDDG

2 [Carpenter-Coustan]*

927

4.4% (4.2–4.7)

1,387

6.6% (6.3–6.9)]

Pocobelli et al., 2018 [64] Washington, USA, 2009–2014 (Routine)

Retrospective study of women with singleton deliveries in one HMO areaµ

Period 1: 8,3632

Period 2: 10,7912

Registered with KP HMO

NR

NR

NR

NR

Two step: 50 g GCT or fasting serum glucose test then 100 g 3 h OGTT.

One step: 75 g OGTT

24–28

24–28

NDDG

2

IADPSG

5

662

7.9% (7.3–8.5)

1244

11.5% (10.9–12.1)

Pouliot et al., 2019 [65] Canada 2014–2016

Retrospective study of all singleton deliveries at one university hospital

Period 1: 1,2952

Period 2: 1,5352

49.7% White

25.8% Middle East

16.2% African-Carribean

5.5% Hispanic

2.3% Asian

0.5% Other

53.2% White

19.7% Middle East

19.7% African-Carribean

3.2% Hispanic

3.6% Asian

0% Other

Period 1: 30.9 (5.3)

31.0 (5.2)

Period 1: 25.5 (5.6)

26.3 (5.9)

Period 1: 33.4%

31.5%

NR

One step: 2 h 75 g OGTT

24–28

Period 1: CDA 2008

4

IADPSG

5

Period 1:

141

10.8% (9.1–12.5)

271

17.6% (15.8–19.6)

Schwartz et al., 1999 [66]

Oregon, USA 1995–1996 (Routine)

All pregnant womenµ

8,8572

Registered with KP HMO North West division

NR

NR

NR

 

Two step: 1 h GCT followed by 100 g 3 h OGTT

28 weeks

NDDG

2 [Carpenter- Coustan]*

284

3.2% (2.8–3.6)

[438

4.9% (3.5–5.4)]

Schwartz et al., 1999 [67]

Detroit, USA

1990–1998

All singleton deliveries in one medical centre in Detroitµ

29,6441

One medical centre

31.0

NR

NR

NR

Two step: 1 h 50 g GCT followed by 100 g 3 h OGTT

24–28 weeks

NDDG

2

1,245

4.2% (4.0-4.4)

Tudela et al., 2012 [68]

Texas, USA, 2000–2003

Retrospective study of women with singleton pregnancies at Texan hospital

24,8831

Parkland Hospital, Texas

25.2

NR

34.6%

34.6%

Two step: 1 h 50 g GCC then 100 g OGTT

NR

NDDG

2

1,044

4.2% (4.0-4.4)

Willows et al., 2011 [69]

Quebec, Canada

1994–2000

Retrospective study of singleton deliveries

2,1271

First Nations (Cree)

NR

NR

NR

NR

One step: 50 g GCT

NR

CDA 2008

4

219

10.3% (9.0–11.6)

Yeung et al., 2017 [70]

British Columbia, Canada

2004–2010 (Routine)

**Retrospective study of all singleton deliveries in British Columbiaµ

247,2152

Geographically defined

30.5

NR

46.6%

NR

Two step: 50 g GTT

Followed by 75 g OGTT

24–28

CDA 2008

4

17,912

7.2% (7.1–7.3)

Xiong et al., 2001 [71]

Northern and Central Alberta, Canada

1991–1997 (Routine)

Retrospective study of all deliveries in one areaµ

111,4192

Geographically defined

NR

NR

40.4%

NR

Two step: 50 g GTT followed by 100 g OGTT

24–28

NDDG

2

2,755

2.5% (2.4–2.6)

  1. Notes
  2. Denominator includes1 or excludes2 women with pre-existing diabetes (or not known3)
  3. Women could be included in study more than onceµ
  4. Abbreviations: NR – Nor reported; FN – First Nations; Non FN – Non First Nations; KP – Kaiser Permanente; HMO – Health Maintenance Organisation
  5. *Not included in meta-analysis
  6. **British Columbia data only used, Alberta data repeated in other studies
  7. NB Where characteristics of the sample are given in italics, the figure may not be the exact value for the denominator used to calculate prevalence estimate