Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of pregnancy characteristics between study and reference groups

From: Analysis of hemi-uterus pregnancy outcomes in uterine malformations: a retrospective observational study

 

Study group

(n = 112)

Reference group

(n = 224)

P value

ART (%)

9.4 (12)

2.2 (5)

0.001#

Gestation age at birth (weeks)

37.9 ± 1.6

39.3 ± 1.2

0.000&

Gestation age at birtha (weeks)

38.6 ± 0.9

39.4 ± 1.0

0.000&

Cervical incompetence

1/112

0/224

/

PROM (%/n)

21.4 (24)

25.4 (57)

0.417#

CAN (%/n)

54.5 (61)

29.9 (67)

0.000#

CAN three times (%/n)

7.1 (8)

0.4 (1)

0.001§

Manual placenta removal (%/n)

9.8 (11)

4.0 (9)

0.034#

Postpartum hemorrhage (%/n)

2.7 (3)

4.5 (10)

0.617§

Uterotonic usage (%/n)

40.2 (45)

37.5 (84)

0.634#

Oligohydramnios (%/n)

3.6 (4)

0.9 (2)

0.098§

Hypertensive disorders (%/n)

4.5 (5)

6.7 (15)

0.415#

Gestational diabetes (%/n)

17.0 (19)

14.7 (33)

0.594#

ICP (%/n)

2.7 (3)

1.3 (3)

0.404*

Placenta previa (%/n)

2.7 (3)

0.4(1)

0.110*

Placental abruption (%/n)

0.9 (1)

1.8 (4)

0.668*

  1. Data are presented as percent (numbers) or mean ± SD
  2. ART, assisted reproductive technology; PROM, premature rupture of membranes; CAN, cord-around-the neck; ICP, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy
  3. a Excluding the preterm births
  4. # Chi-squared test *Fisher’s exact test §Yates correction for continuity
  5. &Student’s t-test