Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of the clinical characteristics between two group after propensity score matching

From: Risk factor for interstitial pregnancy following ipsilateral salpingectomy? A retrospective matched case control study

Variables

IP group(n = 29)

Control group(n = 87)

p Value

Gravidity

2.4 ± 1.7

2.0 ± 1.1

0.170

Parity, n (%)

   

     nulliparous

14(48.3%)

60(69.0)

0.045

     parous

15(51.7)

27(31.0)

 

Reason for salpingectomy, n (%)

   

     Hydrosalpinx

5(17.2)

4(4.6)

0.028

     others

24(82.8)

83(95.4)

 

Salpingectomy-subsequent pregnancy interval

   

     ≤ 6 months

3(10.3)

10(11.5)

0.865

     >6 months

26(89.7)

77(88.5)

 

Previous surgical procedure, n (%)

   

     Laparoscopy

21(72.4)

59(67.8)

0.643

     Laparotomy

8(27.6)

28(32.2)

 

Mode of conception, n (%)

   

     spontaneous

28(96.6)

58(66.7)

0.001

     IVF-ET

1(3.4)

29(33.3)

 

Previous abdominal surgery ,n (%)

10(34.5)

22(27.6)

0.337

Previous intrauterine operation, n (%)

21(72.4)

44 (50.6)

0.040

Sterility ,n (%)

6(20.7)

14(16.1)

0.570

History of ectopic pregnancy ,n (%)

2(6.9)

7(8.0)

0.841

  1. Note: ET = embryo transfer; IVF = in vitro fertilization