Skip to main content

Table 3 OASIS according to classification of episiotomy practices, vaginal deliveries, 2011–2016

From: A novel classification for evaluating episiotomy practices: application to the Burgundy perinatal network

Classification of episiotomy practices

Number of OASIS / Number of women

OASIS rate of each group (%)

Relative size of each group (%)a

Contribution of each group to OASIS rate (%) b

1 – Nulliparous women with a single cephalic pregnancy, at ≥37 weeks gestation, non-instrumental delivery

243/ 22,239

1.1

27.4

33.9

2 – Nulliparous women with a single cephalic pregnancy at ≥37 weeks gestation, instrumental delivery

271/ 8984

3.0

11.1

37.8

3 – Multiparous women with a single cephalic pregnancy at ≥37 weeks gestation, non- instrumental delivery

122/ 41,929

0.3

51.6

17.0

4 – Multiparous women with a single cephalic pregnancy at ≥37 weeks gestation, instrumental delivery

60/ 2677

2.2

3.3

8.4

5 – All women with a single cephalic pregnancy at < 37 weeks gestation

12/ 3374

0.4

4.2

1.7

6 – All women with a single breech pregnancy

5/ 1268

0.4

1.6

0.7

7 – All women with multiple pregnancy

4/ 819

0.5

1.0

0.6

Total

717/ 81,290

0.9

100

100

  1. OASIS obstetric anal sphincter injuries
  2. anumber of women in the group / total number of women delivered
  3. bnumber of OASIS in the group / total number of women having OASIS