Skip to main content

Table 2 Cohort and study characteristics

From: The influence of physical activity during pregnancy on maternal, fetal or infant heart rate variability: a systematic review

First author, year

Study design

Sample (pregnant women)

Intervention, exercise mode, PA determination

HRV outcomes (maternal/fetal/infant)

HRV measure technique

Time(s) of measurement

Data analysis

May, [47]

Post-hoc analysis of maternal magnetocardiograms (May et al. [40]) to assess maternal heart measures depending on maternal exercise behavior (exercise vs. control group) at different weeks of gestation

N = 56 (gw36 N = 51); 20–39 years

singleton, low-risk pregnancies

MPAQ to retrospectively categorize women into exercise (≥30 min. aerobic exercise/ 3 times a week) and control groupa

maternal

M: SDNN, RMSSD, VLF, LF, HF, LF/HF

3 continuous, 18 min simultaneous fetal-maternal MCG were recorded for each subject using an investigational 83-channel dedicated fetal biomagnetometer

Gw28, gw32, and gw36

Students t-test and Wilcoxon rank sum test to contrast variables between exercise and control groups

Van Leeuwen, [41]

Post-hoc analysis of fetal-maternal magnetocardiograms (May et al. [40]) to assess maternal and fetal heart measures depending on maternal exercise behavior (exercise vs. control group)

N = 40; 20–35 years

singleton, low-risk pregnancies

MPAQ to retrospectively categorize women into exercise (≥ 30 min. of moderate to vigorous aerobic exercise/ 3 times a week; n = 21) and control group (n = 19)a

maternal, fetal

M: SDNN, RMSSD

F: SDNN, RMSSD

A continuous, 18 min simultaneous fetal-maternal MCG was recorded for each subject using an investigational 83-channel dedicated fetal biomagnetometer

Gw36

Comparison between control and exercise groups using Mann-Whitney-U test

May, Suminski, [37]

Post-hoc analysis of fetal magnetocardiograms (May et al. [40]) to assess fetal heart measures depending on the duration of maternal continuous and non-continuous leisure-time physical activity

N = 40; 23–39 years

singleton, low-risk pregnancies

MPAQ to retrospectively classify whether the women perform continuous (e.g., walking, jogging) or non-continuous (e.g. weight lifting, yoga)a leisure-time physical activity

fetal

F: SDNN, RMSSD, VLF, LF, HF

A continuous, 18 min simultaneous fetal-maternal MCG was recorded for each subject using an investigational 83-channel dedicated fetal biomagnetometer

Gw36

Pearson Product Monument correlation to assess relationships between duration (min) of maternal continuous and non-continuous LTPA and fetal heart measures;

Multiple regression analyses to predict fetal heart measures

May, Scholtz, [39]

Post-hoc analysis of a subset of infants from a prospective longitudinal pregnancy study (May et al. [40]) to assess infant heart measures depending on maternal exercise behavior (exercise vs. control)

N = 43; 20–35 years, singleton, low-risk pregnancies

MPAQ to retrospectively categorize infants of women who were in the exercise (≥ 30 min. of moderate to vigorous aerobic exercise/ 3 times a week; n = 16) and control group (n = 27)a

infant

I: SDNN, RMSSD, LF, HF

A continuous, 18 min simultaneous fetal-maternal MCG was recorded for each subject using an investigational 83-channel dedicated fetal biomagnetometer

One month of age

Student´s t-tests to compare infant HRV measures between exercise and control group

Gustafson, [42]

Post-hoc analysis of fetal magnetocardiograms (May et al. [40]) to assess fetal heart measures depending on maternal exercise (exercise vs. control)

N = 30; 20–35 years, singleton, low-risk pregnancies

MPAQ to retrospectively categorize women into exercise (≥ 30 min. of moderate to vigorous aerobic exercise/ 3 times a week; n = 15) and control group (n = 15)a

fetal

F: RMSSD, VLF, LF, LF/HF, VLF/LF, VLF/HF, INT

A continuous, 18 min simultaneous fetal-maternal MCG was recorded for each subject using an investigational 83-channel dedicated fetal biomagnetometer

Gw36

Mixed-effects models with post-hoc comparisons. Comparisons for exercise vs. control were adjusted for breathing patterns (breathing vs. apnea)

May, [38]

Post-hoc analysis of fetal magnetocardiograms (May et al. [40]) to assess effects of maternal exercise dose on fetal heart measures

N = 50; 23–39 years, singleton, low-risk pregnancies

MPAQ to retrospectively assess maternal physical activity behavior, specifically duration and intensitya

fetal

F: SDNN, RMSSD, VLF, LF, HF, VLF/LF, VLF/HF, LF/HF

A continuous, 18 min simultaneous fetal-maternal MCG was recorded for each subject using an investigational 83-channel dedicated fetal biomagnetometer

Gw36

Spearman correlations were used to assess relationships between maternal LTPA (intensity, duration) during third trimester and fetal heart measures

Multiple regression were additionally performed to assess how well LTPA intensity and duration predict fetal heart measures

Stutzman [43]

Prospective controlled interventional study to assess pre-to-post changes of exercise conditioning on HRV in normal and overweight women. HRV was measured in supine position and during low-intensity exercise

N = 22; healthy, singleton pregnancy; n = 10 NW (BMI < 25.0 kg/m2), n = 12 OaOb(BMI > 25.0 kg/m2)

Measurements: laboratory testing at gw20 ± 2 and gw36

Intervention:

E: Instructed on a16 week progressive low-intensity walking exercisec, 5 days/week; n = 6 OaO, n = 5 NW

C: Activity log only; n = 6 OaO, n = 5 NW

→4 group design:

a) walking/NW,

b) non-walking/NW, c) walking/OaO,

d) non-walking/OaO

maternal

M: LF, HF, TP, HF/TP, LP/HP

Beat-by-beat R-R intervals were obtained and recorded continuously during testing using three latex-free standard surface ECG electrodes and a Spacelab 514 cardiac monitor

Gw20 and gw36

ANOVAs were used to obtain within and between group changes from gw20 to gw36

May, [40]

Prospective, longitudinal, non-blinded study to assess fetal heart measures depending on self-reported maternal exercise and fetal state

N = 61; 20–35 years

singleton, low-risk pregnancies

MPAQ to retrospectively categorize women into exercise (≥ 30 min. of moderate to vigorous aerobic exercise/ 3 times a week; n = 26) and control group (n = 35)a

fetal

F: SDNN, RMSSD, VLF, LF, IntF, HF

3 continuous, 18 min simultaneous fetal-maternal MCG were recorded for each subject using an investigational 83-channel dedicated fetal biomagnetometer

Gw28, gw32, and gw36

Post-hoc comparisons to obtain changes in fetal heart outcomes between exercise and control groups depending on fetal state (active vs. passive) at gw28, gw32, and gw36

Satyapriya [36]

Prospective, RCT to assess the influence of yoga on maternal HRV (two-group, pre-post-design). Measurements were changes in HRV pre and during exercise session as well as pre and post exercise session (acute effects) at gw20 and gw36 (effects over intervention time; not tested for significance)

N = 90; 20–35 years;

mean BMI: 25.1 (E) and 25.6 (C)

Intervention:

E: two modules of integrated yoga, specifically designed for the second and third trimester of pregnancy (n = 45)

C: standard prenatal exercise (n = 45)

Maternal

M: LF, HF, LF/HF

Electrocardiogram was recorded continuously for 5 min before, 10 min during and 5 min after intervention

Gw20 and gw36

Measuring pre, during, and post each session

ANOVAs to obtain within and between group differences in maternal HRV between exercise and control group

  1. (C control group, E exercise group, ECG electrocardiograph, F fetal, gw gestational week, HF high frequency, HRV heart rate variability, I infant, IntF intermediate frequency, LF low frequency, M maternal, MCG magnetocardiogram, MPAQ Modifiable Physical Activity Questionnaire, NW normal weight, OaO overweight and obese, RMSSD root mean square of successive difference, SDNN standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals, TP total power, VLF very low frequency)
  2. aThe MPAQ was used to retrospectively assess all leisure-time physical activities (LTPA) performed during the last 9 months of pregnancy, plus 3 months before pregnancy (self-reported). Note that no exercise intervention was performed within the highlighted studies
  3. bpre-pregnancy BMI; pre-pregnancy weights of the participants were obtained by self-report from the women and confirmed from medical records
  4. cthe steady-state testing protocol involved a 3-min warm-up at 20 W, followed by a ramp increase in work rate with 30 s to a level corresponding to 40 % of the maximal heart rate reserve