Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Use of the National Diabetes Data Group and the Carpenter-Coustan criteria for assessing gestational diabetes mellitus and risk of adverse pregnancy outcome

Original Submission
14 Jan 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 10
Submitted Manuscript version 10
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 11
Submitted Manuscript version 11
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 12
Submitted Manuscript version 12
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 13
Submitted Manuscript version 13
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 14
Submitted Manuscript version 14
Resubmission - Version 15
Submitted Manuscript version 15
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 16
Submitted Manuscript version 16
Publishing
15 Aug 2016 Editorially accepted
17 Aug 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12884-016-1030-9

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page