Skip to main content
Download PDF

Association between polymorphisms rs2228001 and rs2228000 in XPC and genetic susceptibility to preeclampsia: a case control study

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth volume 21, Article number: 787 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group C (XPC) is a DNA damage recognition protein that plays an important role in nucleotide excision repair and can reduce oxidative stress, which may be involved in the development of preeclampsia (PE). Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore whether XPC polymorphisms were relevant to the genetic susceptibility to PE in Chinese Han women.

Method

A total of 1276 healthy pregnant women were included as the control group and 958 pregnant women with PE as the case group. DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples to perform genotyping of loci rs2228001 and rs2228000 in XPC through real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The relationship between XPC and susceptibility to PE was evaluated by comparing the genotypic and allelic frequencies between the two groups of pregnant women.

Results

Polymorphism of rs2228000 may be associated with PE risk and allele T may play a protective role (genotype, χ2 = 38.961, P < 0.001 and allele χ2 = 21.746 P < 0.001, odds ratio (OR) = 0.885, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.840-0.932). No significant difference was found between the two groups in rs2228001,(genotype χ2 = 3.148, P = 0.207 and allele χ2 = 0.59, P = 0.442, OR = 1.017, 95% CI = 0.974–1.062). When the frequencies of genotypes and alleles for early- and late-onset PE, mild PE and severe PE were compared with those of controls, the results were consistent with the large clinical sample.

Conclusion

Our data suggest that the genetic variant rs2228000 in XPC may be associated with PE risk in Chinese Han women, and that pregnant women with the TT genotype have a reduced risk of PE. Further investigations are needed to confirm these findings in other regions or larger prospective populations.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Preeclampsia (PE) is defined as a special disease that occurs after 20 weeks of pregnancy, with hypertension and proteinuria or one of the following characteristics, thrombocytopenia, liver and kidney function damage, and pulmonary oedema [1], and seriously affects maternal and child health and even leads to death or morbidity during the perinatal period [2]. Although the potential harm of PE has been extensively studied, its pathogenesis remains poorly understood, and many factors may be involved in the development of PE, including inflammatory reactions, placental ischemia, vascular endothelial dysfunction, genetic factors, and oxidative stress [3,4,5].

Compared with normotensive pregnant women, patients with PE are in a state of extremely increased oxidative stress because of the decreased antioxidant capacity. Excess production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) can lead to vascular endothelial and DNA damage, which may be involved in the pathogenesis of PE by blocking trophoblast invasion and placental formation [6, 7]. A comet assay revealed significantly increased levels of DNA damage in the placenta of PE model rats [8]. As a sensitive indicator of DNA damage, phosphorylated H2AX was highly expressed not only in PE placentas but also in maternal metaphase stromal cells cultured in vitro with oxides [9]. Consistent with this result, Takagi et al. [10] found that 8-hydroxy-20-deoxy-guanosin (8-OHdG), a representative DNA damage marker, was detected at higher concentrations in the serum of patients with PE than in healthy pregnant women. There are enzymes related to DNA repair in the human body that can repair these damaged DNA and maintain a stable state of genetic material [11]. Therefore, it is essential to explore the role of genetic polymorphisms in the DNA repair system in PE pathogenesis based on DNA damage.

As a damage recognition protein of DNA, the gene Xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group C (XPC), which belongs to one of the key genes in the nucleotide excision repair system [12], repairs the damaged DNA by nucleotide excision to reduce the damage to DNA, and then reduces the attack of oxidative stress on organisms [13]. The XPC proteins have specific roles in cell protection and repair and tolerance of ROS-induced DNA damage [14]. In addition, reducing or silencing the expression of XPC increases the level of intracellular ROS, which increases oxidative stress and ultimately leads to oxidative DNA damage [15]. Two nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), c.2815G > T (p.Q939E, rs2228001) in exon 16 and c.1496C > T (p.A499V, rs2228000) in exon 9 of XPC may alter the capacity of XPC and modulate risk of various cancers [16, 17]. The positions of the two SNPs on the chromosomes are shown in Fig. 1. Currently, there is a lack of research on the association between these two SNPs and PE susceptibility. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the relationship between polymorphisms of rs2228001 and rs2228000 in XPC and the susceptibility to PE in the Chinese Han population, which further provides an experimental basis for a follow-up clinical study on PE.

Fig. 1
figure 1

A schematic representation of rs228001 and rs228000

Full size image

Materials and methods

Subjects

We enrolled 958 patients with PE and 1276 normal pregnant women at the Linyi People’s Hospital, Zaozhuang Peoples’ Hospital, Heze People’s Hospital, Yantaishan Hospital, and the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from January 2019 to November 2020 as the case and control groups. This study was approved by the ethics committee of Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, and informed consent were obtained from all participants. The diagnostic criteria for PE were based on the ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 202: Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia [1]. The conditions for inclusion in the case group were the presentation of normal blood pressure before 20 weeks of gestation, whereas ≥140/90 blood pressure after 20 weeks of gestation, ≥0.3 g/24 h proteinuria, or one of following symptoms, such as headache, blurred vision, thrombocytopenia, liver and kidney function damage and pulmonary oedema. According to the guidelines, PE patients with systolic blood pressure > 160 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure > 110 mmHg are classified as the severe PE group [1]. Early-onset PE was diagnosed before 34 weeks of pregnancy, whereas late-onset PE was diagnosed after 34 weeks of gestation. The conditions of the control group included ≥26 years old; ≥30 weeks of gestation; no disease of kidney disorders; foetal macrosomia; chronic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and cardiopathy; no abnormality in the liver, kidney, and blood coagulation; and no history of transfusion immunity, obstetric complications such as threatened abortion, premature rupture of membrane, placenta previa, assisted reproduction, and twin or multiple pregnancy.

Genetic studies

Genomic DNA was extracted from 200 μL of peripheral venous blood using a Qiagen DNA extraction kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Genotyping for polymorphisms of rs2228000 and rs2228001 in XPC was performed using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The TaqMan probe was designed by American Applied Bio System Inc. The rs2228000 primers were 5′-CTCTGATCCCTCTGATGAGGATTC-3′ (forward) and 5′- CCACACCGTGCACACAGTCT-3′ (reverse), the rs2228001 primers were 5-CAGAAGCGGCCAGGATACTG-3′ (forward) and 5′-TGTTCTGTAGCTCAAAGGGTGAGT-3′ (reverse). The total volume of the PCR mixture was 25 μL consisting of 1.25 μL 20× SNP Genotyping Assay, 12.5 μL 2× PCR Master Mix, and 11.25 μL DNA and DNase-free water. PCR amplification was performed using a C1000™ cycle instrument and a CFX96™ real-time system. The cycling conditions were as follows: 3 min at 95 °C for predegeneration; a total of 45 cycles of 15 s at 95 °C and 1 min at 60 °C; and 5 min at 72 °C for extension. The genotype was evaluated using BioRad CFX Manager 3.0. We used Haploview 4.2 softwares to analyze the haplotypes of these two SNPs.

Statistical methods

Statistical analysis of experimental data was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 23.0. Demographic and clinical data such as age, gestational age, pregnancy times, blood pressure, and abortion times were analysed using a t-test to compare differences between the controls and cases. The genotypic and allelic frequencies were compared using the chi-square test (if expected values were below 5, the Fisher’s exact test was used). The distribution of genotypic and allelic frequencies in the control group was checked using the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, which ensured that the data were representative of the control group. The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and odds ratios (ORs) were used to determine the relative risk degree. Considering Bonferroni adjustments, statistical significance was set at P < 0.025 for chi-square test.

Results

Demographic and clinical characteristics

The comparison of the demographic and clinical characteristics between the PE cases and controls is presented in Table 1. No significant differences were found between the patients with PE and healthy women across maternal age, times of gravidity, and number of abortions (P > 0.05); however, patients with PE had an earlier admission and delivery gestational weeks, lower foetal weight, and higher blood pressure than the controls (P < 0.001).

Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of the PE and control groups
Full size table

Genotypic and allelic frequencies

The genotypic distribution of controls was in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium for both SNPs (rs2228000: χ2 = 0.024, P = 0.877; rs2228001: χ2 = 0.0005, P = 0.983). Statistical analysis indicated there was statistical difference in the genetic distributions of rs2228000 in XPC between the case and control groups (genotype, χ2 = 38.961, P < 0.001 and allele χ2 = 21.746 P < 0.001, odds ratio (OR) = 0.885, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.840-0.932). However, rs2228001 may be not related to the occurrence of PE (genotype χ2 = 3.148, P = 0.207 and allele χ2 = 0.59, P = 0.442, OR = 1.017, 95% CI = 0.974-1.062) (Table 2).

Table 2 Genotype and allele frequencies in PE and control groups
Full size table

Comparing patients with mild PE with the control group, rs2228000 showed a distribution frequency difference in genotypes (for rs2228000, genotypic frequency, χ2 = 8.849, P = 0.012; allelic frequency, χ2 = 2.389, P = 0.122, OR = 0.924, 95% CI = 0.832-1.026; for rs2228001, genotype χ2 = 0.23, P = 0.892, and allele χ2 = 0.12, P = 0.729, OR = 1.016, 95% CI = 0.931-1.108). For the severe PE group and the control group, the genotype and allele frequencies of the polymorphism rs2228000 were different (for rs2228000, genotypic frequency, χ2 = 36.169, P < 0.001; allele frequency, χ2 = 22.214, P < 0.001, OR = 0.884, 95% CI = 0.827–0.926; for rs2228001, genotype χ2 = 5.012, P = 0.082, and allele χ2 = 0.001, P = 0.97, OR = 1.001, 95% CI = 0.947-1.058) (Table 3).

Table 3 Genotype and allele frequencies between mild or severe PE and control groups
Full size table

Consistent with above results, there were significant differences in genetic distribution of rs2228000 between control group and early-onset PE group (genotype: χ2 = 13.286 P = 0.001; allelic: χ2 = 9.098, P = 0.003, OR = 0.909, 95% CI = 0.852-0.969) or lately-onset PE group (genotype: χ2 = 48.54 P < 0.001; allelic: χ2 = 14, P < 0.001, OR = 0.884, 95% CI = 0.827-0.926). No differences in the genetic distribution of rs228001 were found between the early-onset PE group and the control group (genotypic χ2 = 1.43, P = 0.489; allelic χ2 = 1.388, P = 0.239, OR = 1.033, 95% CI = 0.98–1.089). Comparing the genotypic and allelic frequencies of the late-onset and control groups of rs2228001, no differences were found in genotypic frequency (χ2 = 5.012, P = 0.082) and allelic frequency (χ2 = 0.001, P = 0.97, OR = 1.001, 95% CI = 0.947-1.058) (Table 4).

Table 4 Genotype and allele frequencies between early-onset or late-onset PE and control
Full size table

In addition, we performed interaction and haplotype analysis of these two SNPs and found that there is an linkage disequilibrium between these two loci (Fig. 2) and that haplotypes of AC and AT may be involved in the pathogenesis of PE (Table 5) (AC: χ2 = 21.75, P < 0.001; AT: χ2 = 21.37, P < 0.001).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The linkage disequilibrium association between rs2228001 and rs2228000

Full size image
Table 5 Relationship between haplotype interaction and PE
Full size table

Discussion

There are many studies on the role of genetic polymorphisms in susceptibility to female diseases such as uterine fibroids, recurrent spontaneous abortion, and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). The levels of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) were found to be significantly higher in patients with PCOS than in healthy women; however, findings regarding the association between AMH polymorphisms and the development of PCOS were inconsistent. Therefore, Wang et al. conducted a meta-analysis of five studies and found that AMH genetic variants may not be related to PCOS risk [18]. A genome-wide association study in a Japanese population revealed that nine SNP loci were considered risk factors for uterine leiomyoma, further indicating the important role of genetic factors in uterine leiomyoma [19]. Salimi et al. [20] suggested that SNPs of the HOX transcript antisense RNA gene, such as rs12826786, rs920778, and rs1899663, are related to the development of RSA. Previous studies have reported that women whose mothers and sisters have a history of PE have an elevated risk of PE, which provides evidence for the important role of genetic factors in PE. A common complication of pregnancy, PE is responsible for 7 to 10% of maternal morbidity worldwide [21,22,23], and is caused by many factors, including endothelial damage, inflammatory response, oxidative stress, and placental factors; among which the role of oxidative stress should not be ignored [5, 24]. Patients with PE are in a state of increased oxidative stress, and excessive amounts of oxidants can result in damage to lipids, proteins, and DNA. Damaged DNA can be repaired by DNA repair mechanisms, which are essential for the stability of the genetic material.

However, only a few studies have reported an association between DNA repair system polymorphisms and PE risk. A previous study has shown that in the Iranian population, Arg399Gln of X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 (XRCC1) is associated with PE susceptibility, and the allele 399Gln is considered a risk factor for PE [25]. This result contradicted another study in the Mexican population in which xeroderma pigmentosum group D (XPD) Lys751Gln, XRCC Arg399Gln, and XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphisms were not associated with the risk of PE [26]. This discrepancy in results may be due to racial differences. Moslehi et al. found positive links between specific XPD variants in the foetal genome and the risk of placental maldevelopment and PE [27]. Among the Turkish population, Vural et al. studied three SNP sites on DNA repair genes in XRCC1, Apurinic endonuclease 1, and XPD, indicating that these three SNPs may not be related to the onset of PE [28]. Although the study included important genes in the DNA repair system, its small sample size limited its representativeness. In our previous study, we investigated the association between polymorphisms of the other three core genes in the nucleotide excision repair pathway and PE risk and found that XPA rs1800975, XPF rs1799801, and XPG rs17655 were not significantly correlated with the risk of PE as a whole in Chinese Han women [29].

As an initiator of the nucleotide excision repair process, XPC, located in the short arm of chromosome 3 (3p25), plays a key role in DNA damage recognition by binding to the radiation repair 23 B (RAD23B) protein to form the XPC-RAD23B complex. Relevant studies have found that the expression of XPC can downregulate the expression of ROS and lead to a change in metabolism [15]. In addition, many studies have indicated that XPC polymorphisms are associated with the risk of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and gastric cardiac adenocarcinoma [30]. Therefore, we hypothesised that the genetic polymorphism of XPC is related to the occurrence of PE to explore the possible pathogenesis of PE.

In our study, 1276 normal pregnant women and 958 patients with PE were enrolled. Genotyping of the two loci rs2228000 and rs2228001 in XPC, found that there were significant differences in genotypic and allelic frequencies of rs2228000 between the PE and control groups, and allele T may act as a protect factor. However, no difference was observed in rs2228001 between two groups. To further explore the relationship between them, PE was divided into mild and severe and early-onset and late-onset PE categories. The results generally consistent with those of the large sample data. Then, haplotype analysis showed that AC and AT may be associated with the pathogenesis of PE. Therefore, this study suggests that rs228000 in XPC may be associated with the risk of PE in Chinese Han women and allele T was considered as a protective factor in the pathogenesis of PE.

As PE is a complex and polygenetic hereditary disease, determined by both genetic and environmental factors as well as their interactions, the influence of environmental risk factors for PE should not be ignored in our study. Moreover, our results might also be affected by racial and regional differences, suggesting that we should enlarge the scale of subjects and explore more susceptibility genes of PE from multiple regions, to provide the basis for the pathogenesis of PE from the perspective of genetic analysis. Thus, further research is needed to determine the relationship between XPC and PE.

Availability of data and materials

All data and materials are available in this article.

Abbreviations

PE:

Preeclampsia

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

RNS:

Reactive nitrogen species

8-OHdG:

8-hydroxy-20-deoxy-guanosin

XPC:

Xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group C

NER:

Nucleotide excision repair

SNPs:

Single nucleotide polymorphisms

RAD23B:

Radiation repair 23B

PCOS:

Polycystic ovary syndrome

AMH:

Anti-Müllerian hormone

XRCC1:

X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1

XPD:

Xeroderma pigmentosum group D

RAD23B:

Radiation repair 23 B

References

  1. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 202. Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(1):1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wang H, Guo M, Liu F, Wang J, Zhou Z, Ji J, et al. Role of IL-17 variants in preeclampsia in Chinese Han women. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0140118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Daglar K, Kirbas A, Timur H, Ozturk Inal Z, Danisman N. Placental levels of total oxidative and anti-oxidative status, ADAMTS-12 and decorin in early- and late-onset severe preeclampsia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(24):4059–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Xuan J, Jing Z, Yuanfang Z, Xiaoju H, Pei L, Guiyin J, et al. Comprehensive analysis of DNA methylation and gene expression of placental tissue in preeclampsia patients. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2016;35(1):129–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fox R, Kitt J, Leeson P, Aye CYL, Lewandowski AJ. Preeclampsia: Risk Factors, Diagnosis, Management, and the Cardiovascular Impact on the Offspring. J Clin Med. 2019;8(10):1625. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jcm8101625.

  6. Thompson L, West M. XRCC1 keeps DNA from getting stranded. Mutat Res. 2000;459(1):1–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zalba G, San Jose G, Moreno MU, Fortuno A, Diez J. NADPH oxidase-mediated oxidative stress: genetic studies of the p22(phox) gene in hypertension. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2005;7(9-10):1327–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kolesnikova SA, Eremina AI, Kustova MV, Muzyko EA, Dudchenko GP, Perfilova VN, et al. Evaluation of DNA damage in experimental preeclampsia by comet assay. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2018;164(5):605–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tadesse S, Kidane D, Guller S, Luo T, Norwitz N, Arcuri F, et al. In vivo and in vitro evidence for placental DNA damage in preeclampsia. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e86791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Takagi Y, Nikaido T, Toki T, Kita N, Kanai M, Ashida T, et al. Levels of oxidative stress and redox-related molecules in the placenta in preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction. Virchows Archiv. 2004;444(1):49–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Frosina G. Overexpression of enzymes that repair endogenous damage to DNA. Eur J Biochem. 2000;267(8):2135–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Melis JP, Kuiper RV, Zwart E, Robinson J, Pennings JL, van Oostrom CT, et al. Slow accumulation of mutations in Xpc−/− mice upon induction of oxidative stress. DNA Repair (Amst). 2013;12(12):1081–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hosseini M, Mahfouf W, Serrano-Sanchez M, Raad H, Harfouche G, Bonneu M, et al. Premature skin aging features rescued by inhibition of NADPH oxidase activity in XPC-deficient mice. J Invest Dermatol. 2015;135(4):1108–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Berra CM, de Oliveira CS, Garcia CC, Rocha CR, Lerner LK, Lima LC, et al. Nucleotide excision repair activity on DNA damage induced by photoactivated methylene blue. Free Radic Biol Med. 2013;61:343–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rezvani HR, Rossignol R, Ali N, Benard G, Tang X, Yang HS, et al. XPC silencing in normal human keratinocytes triggers metabolic alterations through NOX-1 activation-mediated reactive oxygen species. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1807(6):609–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ji G, Lin Y, Cao SY, Li LZ, Chen XL, Sun BM, et al. XPC 939A>C and 499C>T polymorphisms and skin cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(10):4983–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dai Y, Song Z, Zhang J, Gao W. Comprehensive assessment of the association between XPC rs2228000 and cancer susceptibility based on 26835 cancer cases and 37069 controls. Biosci Rep. 2019;39(12):BSR20192452. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1042/BSR20192452.

  18. Wang F, Niu WB, Kong HJ, Guo YH, Sun YP. The role of AMH and its receptor SNP in the pathogenesis of PCOS. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2017;439:363–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sakai K, Tanikawa C, Hirasawa A, Chiyoda T, Yamagami W, Kataoka F, et al. Identification of a novel uterine leiomyoma GWAS locus in a Japanese population. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1197.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Salimi S, Sargazi S, Heidari Nia M, Mirani Sargazi F, Ghasemi M. Genetic variants of HOTAIR are associated with susceptibility to recurrent spontaneous abortion: A preliminary case-control study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021;47(11):3767–78. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/jog.14977.

  21. Ge J, Wang J, Zhang F, Diao B, Song ZF, Shan LL, et al. Correlation between MTHFR gene methylation and pre-eclampsia, and its clinical significance. Genet Mol Res. 2015;14(3):8021–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ye W, Shen L, Xiong Y, Zhou Y, Gu H, Yang Z. Preeclampsia is associated with decreased methylation of the GNA12 promoter. Ann Hum Genet. 2016;80(1):7–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhao X, Liu J, Zhao C, Ye P, Ji J, Wang J, et al. Association between COMT Val158Met polymorphism and preeclampsia in the Chinese Han population. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2016;35(4):565–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. San Juan-Reyes S, Gomez-Olivan LM, Islas-Flores H, Dublan-Garcia O. Oxidative stress in pregnancy complicated by preeclampsia. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2020;681:108255.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Saadat I, Beyzaei Z, Aghaei F, Kamrani S, Saadat M. Association between polymorphisms in DNA repair genes (XRCC1 and XRCC7) and risk of preeclampsia. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;286(6):1459–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sandoval-Carrillo A, Méndez-Hernández E, Vazquez-Alaniz F, Aguilar-Durán M, Téllez-Valencia A, Barraza-Salas M, et al. Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes (APEX1, XPD, XRCC1 and XRCC3) and risk of preeclampsia in a Mexican mestizo population. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15(3):4273–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Moslehi R, Kumar A, Mills JL, Ambroggio X, Signore C, Dzutsev A. Phenotype-specific adverse effects of XPD mutations on human prenatal development implicate impairment of TFIIH-mediated functions in placenta. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012;20(6):626–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Vural P, Değirmencioğlu S, Doğru-Abbasoğlu S, Saral N, Akgül C, Uysal M. Genetic polymorphisms in DNA repair gene APE1, XRCC1 and XPD and the risk of pre-eclampsia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;146(2):160–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang H, Liu J, Zhang R, Liu Y, Ren X, Gao K, et al. The relationship between DNA repair genes (XPA, XPF, XPG) polymorphism and the risk of preeclampsia in Chinese Han women. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2018;14:145–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hua RX, Zhu J, Jiang DH, et al. Association of XPC Gene Polymorphisms with Colorectal Cancer Risk in a Southern Chinese Population: A Case-Control Study and Meta-Analysis. Genes (Basel). 2016;7(10):73. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/genes7100073.

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to express my gratitude to all those who helped me during the writing of this manuscript. We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.cn) for English language editing.

Funding

This work was supported by the Province Natural Science Foundation of Shandong under grant number (ZR2019MH127).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jingli Wang and Chengcheng Guan contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medical Genetic Department, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China

    Jingli Wang, Chengcheng Guan, Yucui Zang & Ru Zhang

  2. The Prenatal Diagnosis Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China

    Jingli Wang, Chengcheng Guan, Yucui Zang & Ru Zhang

  3. Obstetrical Department, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China

    Jing Sui, Xiaoying Qi & Shunfu Piao

  4. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Qingdao University Medical College, Qingdao, 266003, China

    Yuwen Wu

Authors
  1. Jingli Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chengcheng Guan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jing Sui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yucui Zang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yuwen Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ru Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xiaoying Qi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Shunfu Piao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Shunfu Piao and Xiaoying Qi designed the experiments. Jingli Wang and Chengcheng Guan performed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. Yucui Zang and Chengcheng Guan participated in the revision of the reviewers’ comments. Jing Sui contributed significantly to analysis and manuscript preparation. Yuwen Wu and Ru Zhang modified the draft. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiaoying Qi or Shunfu Piao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the ethics committee of Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, and informed consent were obtained from all subjects. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, J., Guan, C., Sui, J. et al. Association between polymorphisms rs2228001 and rs2228000 in XPC and genetic susceptibility to preeclampsia: a case control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 21, 787 (2021). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12884-021-04242-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12884-021-04242-1

Keywords

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

ISSN: 1471-2393

Contact us