From: Double- versus single-balloon catheters for labour induction and cervical ripening: a meta-analysis
Study | Period | Country | Method | Sample size total (double/single) | Parity total (double/single) | Balloon Catheter | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Doublex | Singley | ||||||
Ahmed 2016 | 2013.03–2014.04 | Egypt | RCT | 78 (39/39) | all nulliparous | Cook | Foley (50 ml) |
Haugland 2012 | 2010.03–2011.01 | Norway | RCT | 178 (88/90) | NA | Cook | Foley (NA) |
Hoppe 2015 | 2010.01–2013.11 | USA | RCT | 98 (50/48) | nulliparous: 50 (25/25) multiparous: 48 (25/23) | Cook | Foley (30 ml) |
Pennell 2009* | 2001.07–2003.12 | Australia | RCT | 217 (107/110) | all nulliparous | Atad | Foley (30 ml) |
Rab 2015 | 2011.01–2013.12 | Egypt | RCT | 200 (100/100) | nulliparous: 113 (55/58) multiparous: 87 (45/42) | Cook | Foley (30 ml) |
Salim 2011 | 2008.06–2010.12 | Israel | RCT | 293 (148/145) | nulliparous: 155 (78/77) multiparous: 138 (70/68) | Cook | Foley (60 ml) |
Solt 2009 | 2006.01–2008.05 | Israel | RCT | 95 (45/50)§ | nulliparous: 95 (45/50) multiparous: 85 (NA)§ | Cook | Foley (NA) |