Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Effect of implementation of the MORE OB program on adverse maternal and neonatal birth outcomes in Ontario, Canada: a retrospective cohort study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Nov 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
25 Dec 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Victor Adekanmbi
25 Jan 2019 Author responded Author comments - Deborah Weiss
24 Feb 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ahmed Abbas
16 Dec 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mahmoud Abdel-Aleem
17 Dec 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas
Resubmission - Version 2
25 Jan 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
29 Jan 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Victor Adekanmbi
4 Feb 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ahmed Abbas
5 Feb 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas
7 Feb 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mahmoud Abdel-Aleem
13 Feb 2019 Author responded Author comments - Deborah Weiss
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Feb 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 Feb 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas
8 Apr 2019 Author responded Author comments - Deborah Weiss
Resubmission - Version 4
8 Apr 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
4 Feb 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ahmed Abbas
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
29 Jan 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Victor Adekanmbi
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
12 Apr 2019 Editorially accepted
3 May 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12884-019-2296-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement