Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Stakeholder analysis for a maternal and newborn health project in Eastern Uganda

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
21 Aug 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Oct 2012 Author responded Author comments - Gertrude Namazzi
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Oct 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
26 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert Basaza
7 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Emma Pitchforth
12 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Gertrude Namazzi
Resubmission - Version 4
12 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
12 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Gertrude Namazzi
Resubmission - Version 5
12 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
7 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert Basaza
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
26 Feb 2013 Editorially accepted
4 Mar 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2393-13-58

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement